docs: Rebuild documentation as enterprise-grade TLAS platform
- Migrate from custom HTTP server to VitePress framework - Rename project to Tokenized License Approval System (TLAS) - Add comprehensive documentation for all stakeholders: - Business: Executive summary, value proposition, governance - Operations: Infrastructure, installation, monitoring, backup - Departments: User guide, workflows, verification, issuance - Developers: API reference, authentication, webhooks, SDKs - Compliance: OWASP, DPDP Act, IT Act, audit framework - Add modern theme with dark mode and full-text search - Update Dockerfile for VitePress build process Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
72
Documentation/compliance/index.md
Normal file
72
Documentation/compliance/index.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
||||
# Compliance Framework
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
TLAS is designed and operated in compliance with applicable Indian laws, government standards, and international security frameworks.
|
||||
|
||||
## Regulatory Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
### Information Technology Act, 2000
|
||||
|
||||
| Requirement | Implementation |
|
||||
|-------------|----------------|
|
||||
| Section 3A: Electronic signatures | Digital certificates with PKI |
|
||||
| Section 4: Legal recognition of electronic records | Blockchain-based immutable records |
|
||||
| Section 43A: Data protection | Encryption at rest and in transit |
|
||||
| Section 72A: Breach notification | Incident response procedures |
|
||||
|
||||
### Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023
|
||||
|
||||
| Principle | Implementation |
|
||||
|-----------|----------------|
|
||||
| Lawful purpose | Data collected only for licensing functions |
|
||||
| Purpose limitation | No secondary use without consent |
|
||||
| Data minimization | Only necessary fields collected |
|
||||
| Accuracy | Applicant can update their information |
|
||||
| Storage limitation | Defined retention periods |
|
||||
| Security safeguards | Technical and organizational measures |
|
||||
|
||||
### Government Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
| Standard | Compliance |
|
||||
|----------|------------|
|
||||
| GIGW 3.0 | Web accessibility guidelines followed |
|
||||
| MeitY Cloud Guidelines | Data residency in India |
|
||||
| NIC Security Guidelines | Network and application security |
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Standards
|
||||
|
||||
### OWASP Top 10 Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
| Vulnerability | Control |
|
||||
|---------------|---------|
|
||||
| Injection | Parameterized queries, input validation |
|
||||
| Broken Authentication | JWT with secure configuration |
|
||||
| Sensitive Data Exposure | TLS 1.3, AES-256 encryption |
|
||||
| XML External Entities | XML parsing disabled where not needed |
|
||||
| Broken Access Control | RBAC with principle of least privilege |
|
||||
| Security Misconfiguration | Hardened deployment checklist |
|
||||
| Cross-Site Scripting | Output encoding, CSP headers |
|
||||
| Insecure Deserialization | Schema validation |
|
||||
| Components with Vulnerabilities | Automated dependency scanning |
|
||||
| Insufficient Logging | Comprehensive audit logging |
|
||||
|
||||
### ISO 27001 Alignment
|
||||
|
||||
TLAS security controls align with ISO 27001 Annex A:
|
||||
|
||||
- A.5: Information security policies
|
||||
- A.6: Organization of information security
|
||||
- A.9: Access control
|
||||
- A.10: Cryptography
|
||||
- A.12: Operations security
|
||||
- A.14: System acquisition and development
|
||||
- A.16: Incident management
|
||||
- A.18: Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
## Documentation Index
|
||||
|
||||
- [Data Protection](/compliance/data-protection) - Personal data handling procedures
|
||||
- [Audit Framework](/compliance/audit) - Logging, monitoring, and audit procedures
|
||||
- [Security Standards](/compliance/security) - Technical security controls
|
||||
- [Regulatory Alignment](/compliance/regulatory) - Detailed compliance mapping
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user