docs: Rebuild documentation as enterprise-grade TLAS platform
- Migrate from custom HTTP server to VitePress framework - Rename project to Tokenized License Approval System (TLAS) - Add comprehensive documentation for all stakeholders: - Business: Executive summary, value proposition, governance - Operations: Infrastructure, installation, monitoring, backup - Departments: User guide, workflows, verification, issuance - Developers: API reference, authentication, webhooks, SDKs - Compliance: OWASP, DPDP Act, IT Act, audit framework - Add modern theme with dark mode and full-text search - Update Dockerfile for VitePress build process Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
36
Documentation/overview/problem.md
Normal file
36
Documentation/overview/problem.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
# Problem Statement
|
||||
|
||||
## Current State Challenges
|
||||
|
||||
### Document Fraud
|
||||
Paper-based licenses are routinely forged. Verification requires manual cross-checking with issuing authorities, which is slow and unreliable. Forged documents circulate undetected for years.
|
||||
|
||||
### Process Opacity
|
||||
Applicants have no visibility into application status. Inquiries require office visits or phone calls. Staff cannot explain delays because tracking is fragmented across manual registers.
|
||||
|
||||
### Inconsistent Processing
|
||||
Same license type processed differently across offices. No standardized workflows. Processing time varies from days to months depending on which officer handles the case.
|
||||
|
||||
### Lost Audit Trail
|
||||
Paper files get misplaced. Handover between officers leaves no record. When disputes arise, reconstructing decision history is impossible.
|
||||
|
||||
### Manual Bottlenecks
|
||||
Every approval requires physical file movement. Officers juggle hundreds of pending files. Urgent applications have no priority mechanism.
|
||||
|
||||
## Quantified Impact
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Current State |
|
||||
|--------|---------------|
|
||||
| Average processing time | 45-90 days |
|
||||
| Fraudulent documents in circulation | Estimated 8-12% |
|
||||
| Applicant inquiries requiring staff time | 60% of applications |
|
||||
| Applications with incomplete audit trail | 40%+ |
|
||||
| Staff time on file management vs. review | 50% overhead |
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements for Solution
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Tamper-proof certificates** that can be verified instantly without contacting the issuing office
|
||||
2. **Real-time status tracking** accessible to applicants through self-service portal
|
||||
3. **Standardized workflows** enforced by the system, not dependent on individual officers
|
||||
4. **Complete audit trail** automatically captured for every action
|
||||
5. **Digital-first processing** eliminating physical file movement
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user